🔗 Share this article

We are in Black History Month in the United Kingdom, and it appears it’s time for a re-evaluation. Throughout its history, an observance that was initiated as a festivity and recollection of the past, cultural identity and bonds between Black populations worldwide, has adopted a business-like atmosphere, broadening to incorporate events where individuals of African heritage are paid to talk to white audiences about implicit prejudice and supportive partnership. The 2020s Black Lives Matter protests created a surge in the industry of showcasing anti-racist commitment. However, that period has concluded. The wave has reached its height, resulting in a somewhat empty inheritance of what promoting consciousness is for.

The History of Black History Month

Originally observed in the America and its northern neighbor, Black History Month was established in 1962 as an observance of African American heritage by Black scholar Carter G. Woodson with seven days of commemoration and observance in the second week of February. Black History Month grew out of this initiative and was officially launched in 1970. Now it is celebrated not only in the North America in the second month, but also in October in the UK, Germany, Ireland and the the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

The observance has transformed since that time, placing less emphasis on the histories of colonial slavery and fights for racial justice, and more on notable African descendants in government, the arts, and social movements, and broadly celebrating the impact Black people have made to shape the country. It is in educational institutions where Black History Month is most regularly observed, with talks and cultural events. But the way the month is commemorated is a manifestation of the political moment. How it progresses is a good lesson in how appropriation leads to weakening: the transformation of Black History Month has hindered the objective of it, which is to address systemic and institutional racism.

---

A Jarring Moment

Few things illustrate how important it is to reevaluate Black History Month as much as the specific period in which it occurs this year. In the United Kingdom, a resurgent right in the guise of the Reform organization is ahead in surveys. In the warmer months we saw the largest far-right rally in British history. a prominent political figure, the Black leader of the Tory party, is a firm opponent of anti-racism activism, and we are in a position where a elected representative feels empowered to state that a lack of white people in specific city neighborhoods is a source of worry. Simultaneously, far-right parties are expanding in Europe as a complete entity.

In the United States, a significant offensive against inclusion programs and preferential policies has been brought, frequently with success, to the supreme judicial bodies of the nation. A campaign to remove African American heritage and legacy from the records is ongoing. One of the former president's initial presidential directives targeted the National Museum of African American History and Culture, and the Smithsonian Institution, claiming they of a coordinated and broad attempt to rewrite our Nation’s history” by portraying America “as fundamentally prejudiced”.

Given these circumstances, the observance represents how minimally it can be effective if it is restricted to either dutiful corporate observances, or stripped of political content festivities of former accomplishments, rather than addressing the conditions of the present. It also reveals how its short period means that it is detached from the wider consistent effort that is required. An academic expert, a prof at University of Greenwich, put it best when she expressed apprehension about the fleeting superficial actions of the celebration. “The problem with taking a tokenistic approach”, she stated, “is that it typically leads to that Black History Month evolves into a brief show rather than a catalyst for change.”

---

Rethinking, But Not Jettisoning

Figuring out how to adjust, modify and expand actions for fair treatment and appreciation in such periods of dismay and anxiety is a treacherous thing. There is a urge to just discontinue things like Black History Month entirely, believing they are inadequate for current needs, or are vestiges of an time that has not worked.

But despite everything, Black History Month, and in fact the complete comprehensive structure and tradition of campaigns for equality – grassroots Black Lives Matter organisations, DEI programs, and yes, even those talks to businesses – represent an framework that a significant effort has been dedicated to. It is there not just to decay as the politics moves on (and in fact, deteriorates), but to be a vital organism.

So what would a contemporary active Black History Month look like? To begin with, it would be extended beyond a brief observance: something that is dispersed through the year (as various establishments are already starting to implement), sections of its curriculum (particularly around prominent figures of color) incorporated into academic syllabi. It would also be a period that does not evade governmental matters, and provides room for citizens, particularly youth, to air their fears and experiences. What use is mere awareness of the past when it fails to address the current situation of ultra-nationalist gatherings in the urban areas? Institutions who celebrate it should not be reassured with the non-confrontational words of implicit prejudice and sensitivity to minor insults, but challenged by the dangers that face all if fight against prejudice is not taken seriously. To summarize, Black History Month should be made current, pressing, and adaptive. Maybe an total re-identification is required – Black History is Now Month.